Waiters and Wheels Essay Example

Servers and Wheels Essay Example Servers and Wheels Essay Servers and Wheels Essay BANGALORE MANAGEMENT ACADEMY .Assignment On WAITER ON WHEELS Submitted by: Ivneet Singh(081301221 ) Table of Contents Sr. No| Topic| Pg. No| 1. | Abstract | 3| 2. | Introduction| 4| 3. | Analysis of current system| 4| 4. | Solutions for problems| 5| 5. | Feasibility study| 5| 6. | Feasibility report| 6| 7. | Operational practicality PIECES Framework| 7| 8. | Schedule Feasibility | 8| 9. | Economic Feasibility| 9| 10. | Stages of SSADM| 10| 11. | Detail business specification| 11| 12. | Flowchart| 12| 13. | Context Level Diagram| 13| 14. | Data Flow Diagram| 14| 15. ER-Diagram| 16| 16. | Physical Design | 17| 17. | Individual reports| 24| Abstract The principle target of the task is to distinguish the diverse structure of exercises related with approachs and portray how the procedures are utilized together to build up a framework. The venture incorporates the standard approach to build up the framework and recording of task too. The procedure chose by our group is SSADM which represen ts organized framework examination and plan. The chose procedure has been plainly defended and contrasted with other related philosophy. All the obligatory prerequisite and detail for making the framework configuration are clarified quickly. Physical and legitimate plans are mapped precisely having clear and point by point documentation of structuring stage. To finish this venture in viable manner . had contributed their best with the goal that all standards can be secured effectively. Anybody can see effectively as there is a decent order on language through the entire documentation of undertaking. Presentation They were two understudies Sue Tom Bickford concentrating in school who additionally functioned as low maintenance work in an eatery and consistently envisioned to open their own café. Their underlying speculation was consistently far off so they saw numerous cafés that offer home conveyance administration . They got a thought of opening their own eatery without high venture . This thought struck a chord subsequent to meeting numerous individuals who needed home conveyance administration with their total food determination. By this, they opened an eatery â€Å"Waiter on Wheels† in 1997. This eatery gives food conveyance to the clients by get-together the dinners structure various cafés and giving under one rooftop. Clients enjoyed this administration without question and their business server on wheels was expanding step by step. As there was increment in the quantity of clients and their requests they began confronting a few issues to maintain their business successfully. Investigation of current framework Now we will examine the current arrangement of server on wheels. Client considers server on wheels to put in the request, server on wheels will at that point educate to related eateries and to driver to take the conveyance structure the café and spot it to the ideal client address. The driver picks the request structure eateries and conveys to the client and returns to server on wheels. Issues looked in existing framework * Limited client inclusion Inadequate assets necessity * Business prerequisite have changed among beginning and liberation * Absence of CASE support for examination and structure * Low degree of contribution of clients was because of need on possession and affirmation of the framework * Inadequate strategies * Inadequate planning and devices * No refreshing of database the board framewor k Solutions for the current issues: The main answer for the issue is to adjust the automated client assistance framework to help their business tasks which will assist them with the exact and quicker estimations to create * End of day store slip Weekly report of eateries * Sales report according to their longing I. e. week after week or month to month * Able to record arranges adequately and educating end client proficiently * Inform drivers and eateries at a tick of catch. * Increase conveyance execution by stream of information in a proficient manner Feasibility study Feasibility is characterized as the practicality of task possibility doesn't take care of any issue yet it gives an extent of taking care of an issue. The point of our attainability report is to discover the issue of the current framework in servers on haggles the end clients necessities. Authenticity of task To choose whether the points expressed in the venture are sensible inside the given requirements. Extent of upgrades In current framework there are loads of issue with recording request, creating day and week after week deals report which prompts irregularity in conveying the dinners requested on schedule and running the eatery. We are building up a framework which will help sifting through such issues successfully and proficiently. Pro help We are building up an easy to understand framework so no specialization is equired to work the framework, even an individual with smidgen information in PCs will have the option to work it. Guideline work territory To decide if the rule work regions identifying with the points expressed in the task grant arranging of full examination including the venture groups divisions and application included. Possibility report Our attainability report comprises of: * Technical plausibility * Operational achievability * Schedule practica lity * Economic plausibility Technical Feasibility: Technical possibility address three significant issues * Is the proposed framework innovation is reasonable Does the association as of now have the essential innovation * Does the association have the fundamental specialized aptitude * And in the event that the innovation is absent, at that point is it moderate by the association Generally, the innovation for the any characterized arrangement is accessible. The inquiry which ought to be considered is whether that innovation is full grown enough to be effectively applied to the issue. A few firms like to utilize most recent innovation, however the majority of the organizations favor a develop and demonstrated innovation . A develop innovation has a bigger client base for getting counsel concerning issues and upgrades. Accepting that the solution’s innovation is viable, the subsequent stage is to decide if it is accessible in the association has the ability to utilize it? On the off chance that the response to nay of the above inquiries is no, at that point the chance of getting it from outside ought to be thought of. In the event that it is accessible outside, however is excessively exorbitant for the association to buy it, at that point the elective that requires the innovation isn't commonsense and is in fact infeasible. Operational practicality: In operational attainability study quantifies the earnestness of the issue or the worthiness of an answer . There are two parts of operational practicality which ought to be thought of. * Is the difficult worth explaining, or will the answer for the difficult work? * What do the end clients, and the administration feels about the issue? This achievability was conveyed to find the solution to the inquiry whether the framework will be utilized and actualized whenever created. Would there be any obstruction from its clients. PIECES FRAMEWORK * Performance: Receiving client request till conveying Order. Data: How the data is passed from WOW †Driver Restaurants * Economy: It is cost useful * Control: Installing secret word, firewall and antivirus , so that there is no unapproved get to * Efficiency: System is time proficient and viable, giving the data on single tick * Services: System will offer attractive and dependable support to client and end clients Sc hedule Feasibility: Schedule attainability is an investigating the ideal opportunity for a venture to be finished. The timetable attainability comprises of: Work Load Matrix Tasks| Ivneet| Identifying the current system| * | Analysis of current system| * | * | Problems in existing system| | * | * | Feasibility report| | * | * | Work load matrix| * | Gantt chart| | * | Operational feasibility| | * | Selection of methodology| * | * | * | * | Justification | * | Investigation techniques| | * | Logical design| * | * | Physical design| | * | * | Conclusion | * | Economic practicality The financial attainability underlies the entire framework advancement exertion. We expect the Economic possibility to investigate the expense of the task so as to know whether it merits spending to build up the framework. The framework that we are going to configuration is adaptable and more affordable which will give prompt access to records that are just occasionally refreshed. Cost †advantage examination This to investigate, The expense to build up the framework Which incorporates labor costs, and the innovation used to construct the framework and so forth. The business cost If the framework is grown then what will be its support costs? Choosing the system In this we need to choose the approach for our undertaking I. e. Server on Wheels client care framework. Essentially there are two kinds of strategy utilized for the undertakings Structured System Analysis and Design Methodology and Object Oriented Methodology. We have picked Structured System Analysis and Design Methodology (SSADM) Reasons for choosing this philosophy It gives quantifiable, reviewable and determinable item determination. Toward the end, the procedure draws on more framework work force assets just as client inclusion. It builds association and correspondence among framework and clients. It additionally permits assignment of more straightforward errands to junior staff which mean every single . part is similarly conveyed among assignments. An incredible effect of this strategy is that the absolute time and cost are significantly diminished, if framework created by this philosophy is executed in the association. Stages that ought to be followed SSADM * Analysis of the current framework * Detailed business determination * Logical information structure * Logical procedure plan * Physical plan. Point by point business detail Client considers server on wheels to put in the request, Waiter on wheels at that point educates to the related cafés for the request. Waite

American Dietary Guidelines Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

American Dietary Guidelines - Assignment Example The task American Dietary Guidelines talks about the dietary rules for Americans. With an exponentially expanding budgetary spending plan on overseeing diet-situated constant ailments, the American dietary rules assume a pivotal job in guaranteeing Americans center around advancing wellbeing and minimization of ailment. Weight the board includes guideline of elements adding to corpulence and maintaining a strategic distance from it. There are stress utilization low sodium and strong fats, sugars, and cholesterol, just as liquor as these, add to less than stellar eating routine related incessant illnesses. The rules suggest the expansion of nourishments with satisfactory supplements, and that forestall infections like entire grains, low-fat milk and sans fat milk items like lean meat eggs, peas, oils, and unsalted nuts and seeds. With the information on what to eat, what not to eat, and how to adjust one’s load through calories, the rules give data on the best way to characteri ze a smart dieting design so as to limit their supplement requirements.The significant suggestions are for Americans to guarantee they hold fast to expending adjusted calorie consumption while consolidating physical movement as a method of overseeing weight. Another suggestion is on utilization of expanded measures of certain supplements including vegetables, natural products, entire grains, low-fat, and sans fat items. Americans are encouraged to expend food that comprises low measures of soaked fats, sodium like salt, included sugars, cholesterol, trans fats, and refined grains.

First Samuel Analysis free essay sample

Advances depicted in the principal book of Samuel, for example, the change from being decided by judges to that of a decision government. Numerous inquiries concerning the setting of the principal book of Samuel have been asked, accepting no unmistakable answer. Questions like who composed first Samuel? The origin is still as of now obscure. The principal book of Samuel, itself gives us no sign of the author’s character. In any case, we can presume that whoever the creator is, they needed to have access to various records about the lives and times of Samuel, Saul, and David. There have been many theory with respect to the creator boat of first Samuel; anyway none has any huge measure of proof to demonstrate them valid and exact. Others ask â€Å"When was first Samuel composed? † From legitimately inside this essential source we can set up around what time it was composed. In first Samuel, we are informed that the seniors of Israel started to request a ruler to control them. This gives us proof that the essential source was composed around a similar time when Saul was designated King of Israel. The specific dates are obscure, yet researchers estimated the date to be around 1040 BC, like when Saul was delegated lord. We can likewise decide the rough area wherein the source was composed. In view of the essential subjects in the source, Israel and the Hebrews, It would be proper to expect that it was composed inside or close to their social society. The writer of the primary book of Samuel proposed his crowd to straightforwardly be the network of the Hebrews. Directly in the source the creator offers the Hebrews guidance and messages from God; such counsel like that in I Samuel part eight, versus ten through seventeen. The creator stated, â€Å"The ruler will take your children and your girls, your vineyards and fields, just as a tenth of your seed. This source was composed for the Hebrews, as a type of record keeping, and as an approach to cause them to notice the missteps they had made before. Another, progressively unequivocal motivation behind the primary book of Samuel is to speak to the change of Israel from the hour of judge’s administering to the standard of rulers, going from a rel igious government, to a government. It records the life of Samuel, the remainder of the appointed authorities, and how he clears a path for the future lords to govern Israel, explicitly of King Saul and David, a future ruler of Israel. The source likewise enlightens us regarding how rulers are dependent upon human mistake. They can become degenerate and shameful like some other individual. It gives us understanding about how God, accepts that we are to act. That we should concentrate not on the physical natural things, yet rather on the otherworldly and strict parts of life. In the book of Samuel the progress from a religious government to a government, is depicted by three fundamental figures; Samuel, speaking to the old standard of the appointed authorities, Saul speaking to the flopped first endeavor at a government for Israel, and David Being the perfect ruler for Israel as per God. We see an image painted of absolution from God. His kin get some distance from him, yet he gives them what they need, a ruler. Also, again when the lord becomes degenerate they despite everything need another ruler. God even cautioned them and guaranteed them a ruler that he would not keep from getting degenerate. In the end discovering favor in David, God gives them a genuine ruler who was committed to God. .When perusing a source like the main book of Samuel we need to remember that there might be predispositions to consider. At first from its exceptionally long history, we realize that the principal book of Samuel had been initially written in Hebrew. Along these lines predispositions may emerge from the various interpretations of this source. Inclinations from interpretations as old as this source could emerge out of the interpreters themselves, regardless of whether they know it or not. Few out of every odd one-sided interpretation is deliberate, anyway it just demonstrates that not all interpretations can be, or are precise constantly. We are additionally given data in this source from the perspective that trusted Israel having a lord was a poorly conceived notion. The musings, at that point from the creator would need to be examined for a predispositions focusing on hostile to monarchial emotions. In the event that one didn't need a lord to administer, all they would need to do is placed some key thoughts into the people’s heads through what they read in this source at that point. For instance in the book of first Samuel, part 8, refrains eleven through eighteen; the writer, through a memory of what Samuel said to the Hebrews, depicts Samuel cautioning the Hebrews of the considerable number of debasements that can happen to a lord. Additionally, our powerlessness to precisely put what setting this source was composed, emerges another conceivable predisposition, our absence of information about the creator. We are left simply think about who was attempting to say what regarding the occasions portrayed in the source. We may not ever know whether this source was composed as the occasions happened sequentially, or if the creator reviewed them from their memory as they trusted them to have occurred, regardless of whether it was not in every case precisely how it occurred. The principal book of Samuel has been utilized as an essential source by numerous academic people groups. It like every single other source, it is liable to inclinations. The specific sum we may never know. However, to the Hebrew people group it is a solid record covering significant pieces of their past that can't be overlooked. Indeed, even without knowing precisely who the creator was, individuals speculate instructed estimates and spot the creator to Samuel himself, and additionally, somebody with access to the records from the timespan canvassed in the source. From this source we do get a smart thought about how the Israelites went from a religious government to a popular government. We likewise come to comprehend that for the Hebrew people groups, Samuel was an arbiter among god and the individuals at that point. Every single chronicled source like the book of First Samuel ought to and must be fundamentally examined with a receptive outlook. We ought not let our own convictions influence how well we decide the precision of a source. Indeed, even a strict verifiable source, for example, this one can be helpful in scholar’s inquire about.

Computer Software Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

PC Software Review - Essay Example Nonetheless, dissimilar to past programming bundles, it is beyond the realm of imagination to expect to gain windows 8.1 through the windows update program (Sosinsky, 2013). It was the aim of the engineers of windows 8.1 to address the different grievances that clients of windows 8 had. These protests radiated from the troubles in understanding the UI of the product, to contradiction issues with some significant program programs (Sosinsky, 2013). Noticeable upgrades presented in windows 8.1 remembers an improvement for the beginning screen, a tight combination of OneDrive, extra number of snap sees, web wayfarer 11, an extra packaged applications, a bound together inquiry framework that is engaged by Bing, capacity of reestablishing an obvious beginning catch on the PC taskbar, ability of reestablishing past conduct of an opening of the work area of a client on the login, instead of the beginning screen (Sosinsky, 2013). Moreover, windows 8.1 has figured out how to include bolster highlights for developing advancements, for example, 3D printing, high goals shows, Miracast gushing, Wi-Fi Direct, and so forth. Besides, the UI of windows 8.1 empowers clients to get the capacity of effectively associating with the PC framework. It utilizes a graphical UI, and a point to click innovation of the cursor and the mouse. This makes it to be very easy to understand, giving clients a decent involvement with utilizing the PC framework that is introduced with windows 8.1 (Sosinsky, 2013). Understand that the regular highlights of a graphical UI incorporate menus, and symbols. In windows 8.1, the beginning screen can give the primary collaboration that an individual has with the working framework. This is the primary picture that an individual finds in a screen, when the framework has been booted. It can furnish a person with an entrance to the instruments, and uses of the regularly utilized projects of the PC

Developing your Empowering People Skill Essay

The accompanying abilities practice is center around how administrator can create engaging individuals (appointing) expertise. As indicated by Robbins and Coulter (2012), explain the task, determine the employee’s scope of prudence, permit the worker to take an interest, advise other that designation has happened, and set up criticism channels are the five activities that different a compelling delegator from an insufficient delegator. It is basic for chief to be successful delegator in light of the fact that not constantly or information to take a shot at each and every venture. To rehearse the five aptitudes, Robbins and Coulter have given a situation. The situation included an administrator (Ricky Lee) who is at present doesn't possess the energy for another undertaking, the chief (Anne Zumwalt) who need the director to set up the department’s new methodology manual, and Ricky’s worker (Bill Harmon) who will be task with the venture. The group (Team B) is going the five activities as a rule to take care of the issue. In the subtitled situation, one should initially get consent from Anne Zumwalt to task Bill Harmon with this venture. Bill is picked for this task for his three years involvement with the agreements gathering; thusly, he is more than equipped for finishing the errand in a good way. One would then need to plunk down with Bill and check whether he has the opportunity and inspiration to finish the assignment (Robbins and Coulter, 2012). On the off chance that Bill concurs, one would then clarify the subtleties of the task. This can be accomplished by explicitly distinguishing the substance and extent of the manual. On the off chance that there is a sure standard configuration, that ought to be examined too. It would should be brought up that intensive research, reference material and precise data is normal in the manual. As suggested in Robbins and Coulter (2012) Bill should then be given a cutoff time. The Friday of the week before the finish of theâ month would give Ricky time to audit the work and direct any changes. Robbins and Coulter (2012) clarifies the following stage as, â€Å"Specify the employee’s scope of discretion† (p. 282). Ricky would then need to disclose to Bill what his scope of circumspection is for this undertaking. As this is a genuinely huge undertaking with a short cutoff time, it is fitting to give Bill attentiveness to assign segments of the manual to those workers with involvement with each segment. Ricky should demand that all despite the fact that Bill has the opportunity to task others for help, every official conclusion rest with Ricky to guarantee somebody isn't pulled away from different activities. Ricky ought to likewise advise Bill to utilize the entirety of the assets he needs at the workplace to finish the errand. The following stage is to indicate the degree of support the worker will have in the undertaking (Robbins and Coulter, 2012). As to level of cooperation in the venture, that choice ought to be left to him and will rely upon his authority style. Bill ought to be reminded that at last, the venture is his obligation, paying little mind to his degree of support. Now, a gathering with the entirety of the representatives ought to be held where Ricky would declare what has been assigned to Bill for this task. Robbins and Coulter (2012) shows the reason for this progression is to tell others that an appointment has happened, to whom and what its conditions are. Ricky should worry with everybody this is a significant task, during which, everybody should give 100% of their vitality. Ricky should explain that Anne Zumwalt has given him prudence to task others with parts of the venture so there would be no test to his power. To set up criticism directs as talked about in Robbins and Coulter (2012), Ricky ought to teach Bill to give him progress reports every Monday about the earlier week’s work to guarantee he remains on target. Ricky ought to likewise teach Bill to have the undertaking finished the Friday of the week preceding the month's end. Along these lines, there is a great opportunity to survey the manual, make modifications and smooth it over before the cutoff time. It would likewise be fitting for Ricky to keep an eye on Bill haphazardly during every week to guarantee he isn't manhandling his power or is off kilter with the undertaking. â€Å"Delegation is a workmanship that must be polished. Barely any individuals are brought into the world with this natural capacity, however given time and practice, they can figure out how to turn into sure and careful delegators† (Mahoney, 1997) Anne was clear in her ways to Ricky as she uncovered her necessities and quickly yet in extraordinary detail characterizing the task, determine the employee’s scope of caution, permit the representative to take an interest, advise other that assignment has happened, and set up criticism channels. Which thusly Ricky too rehearsed the five activities that different a viable delegator from an inadequate delegator when educating Bill regarding the task. I appreciated both Anne and Ricky activities: Anne depict the genuine fundamentals what we call the who, what, when, where and how. What's more, Ricky attacked the issue in earnest and in his prerequisites delved somewhat further into the subtleties. Ricky laid a framework, course of events and left the group seven days to fix any inadequacies if necessary once Bill finished the errand. I felt that was incredible in his arranging. The other think I appreciated in this procedure was Ricky’s capacity to perceive his own remaining burden and realized immediately who to delegate to and realized that people range of abilities, all which reveals to me Ricky is a very in turned kind pioneer. In the event that Ricky had not appointed to Bill the task most likely would not have been as solid as a last item due to his present outstanding burden. In my long stretches of driving and overseeing I have watched numerous pioneers take on beyond what they could deal with and terrible things occur. Assigning is aptitude that all heads, administrators must have to be successful from a more prominent perspective. Which means chiefs must know their kin and their ranges of abilities and obviously trust their group incredibly to appoint task. Both Anne and Ricky plainly rehearsed the five abilities present in Robbins and Coulter book. References Robbins, S.P. and Coulter, M. (2012). The executives. (eleventh ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Janet Mahoney, Nursing Management, (1997), (Volume 28) (Issue 6), Springhouse Corporation, Chicago

How to Get Home from the Airport for Free

How to Get Home from the Airport for Free Almost exactly a week ago, after a blissfully underbooked flight back to Boston from a family vacation in Toronto, I took the T back to MIT for free like I always do. When I first came to MIT I was terrified of public transportation. It was only a few years ago that I stopped taking cabs when travelling alone. The T is not scary. In addition, if you’re on your way home from Boston Logan, it’s free. I Instagrammed the trip back from the airport so that I could show you, step by step. Keep in mind that the T is only an option if your plane arrives when the T is actually running (5-ish am to 2-ish am on weekends or midnight-ish on weeknights, except on Sundays, when the T runs 6-ish am to sometime shortly after midnight).   As soon as you get off the plane, follow the signs to the Silver Line bus stop on the first floor. Just outside will be a neon sign counting down to the next bus. (The Silver Line stops at each terminal.)   Wait under the big cement Silver Line T posts. Bring a book.   To your left (or somewhere nearby) is a map of the MBTA subway system. You’re going to take the Silver Line bus to South Station; from there you are going to take the Red Line to MIT. I don’t actually expect you to be able to read anything in the picture above. You can see the map online here. Eventually, a Silver Line bus will arrive. Get on the bus.   Inside the bus are racks to store your luggage and a scrolling neon sign announcing the next stop, which is also announced over the intercom. (If you were travelling to rather than away from the airport, the announcements would include the terminal and the airlines that use that terminal.) You want to stay on until the very last stop, South Station, which is when most of the other people on the bus will get off. Get off at South Station. Behind you is the desolate industrial wasteland that is Silver Line Way. Luckily you don’t have to go there. A charitable and durable bus took you through Mordor for free. Turn back around. Ahead of you, another neon sign advertises the next Red Line trains. It will list Alewife, Ashmont, and/or Braintree. Turn right. You’re going toward Park Street and Downtown Crossing, which are in downtown Boston, so you’ll want to follow the signs to the inbound train (currently the train to Alewife). Go up the stairs and turn right.   In case you don’t have the inbound and outbound directions from each station memorized (I don’t), there is a helpful map at the top of the stairs. The last labelled station on the right is South Station, the station we are in now. Among the labelled stations are Kendall, the station closest to MIT’s campus, and Central, the station closest to Random Hall. We seem to be going the right way. Follow the stairs on your right to the inbound trains. On your right will be another neon sign, now advertising the arrival time of the next two trains going in this direction. If you’re hoping to make it to MIT, it should say Alewife. If you were heading in the other direction, from MIT to South Station, it would say Ashmont or Braintree (the two branches at the bottom of the rightmost map above). Notice that at no point have you had to pay. On this trip, you won’t.   On your left will be more of the same and, eventually, a train. Get on that train.   As in the bus, inside the train is a scrolling neon sign announcing the next stop; the next stop is also announced over the intercom. In addition, there are helpful placards over the doors displaying the same map from earlier, now with all the Red Line stops written out. You can track your train’s progress as it makes its way to MIT (Kendall and Central). Eventually, you will see Kendall outside the windows and on the neon sign in your train car, and you will also hear it announced. Unless you live in Random Hall or want to stop by a grocery store or a restaurant or have an adventure, get off here. (If you do live in Random but you prefer the scenic route through the Infinite Corridor over the scenic route through Central Square, you can get off at Kendall anyway; it is almost the same distance home.) If you live in Random Hall, get off at Central instead. Cross the street and walk against traffic on that side of Massachusetts Avenue (turn left after crossing the street). Harvest and Shaw’s (two wonderful grocery stores) and then Random will be on your right. H-Mart (another wonderful grocery store) will be on your left. Random Hall is next door to the gas station.   If you get off at Kendall, this is the view that will greet you.   Turn right and walk through the ninja gates with which people pay to get on the train. You didn’t have to pay to get home from the airport, but any other trips you take will not be free. There is a Charlie card embedded in your student ID. After you recieve your ID you can add money at any entrance marked as having a pay station. In case you are wondering, if you try to sneak past the gates, perhaps on accident, you will be able to do it, easily. You are then likely to be stopped and ticketed several hundreds of dollars. It happened to a friend of ours. Once you’re past the gates go up the stairs on your left.   At the top of the stairs is a glowing Microsoft sign. You are almost home. Above you is Microsoft. MIT is behind you. After the stairs make a 180-degree turn and look ahead. You are on Main Street.   Cross the street. Turn right and walk straight, toward the glowing blue T.   On your left is where you would probably enter the T if you were travelling back to South Station. It is an entrance to the inbound trainsâ€"inbound because it would take you back toward Park Street and Downtown Crossing. (Because you passed Park Street and Downtown Crossing on your way from South Station to MIT, the entrance to the train you just got off of now says outbound, not inbound.) Turn left, toward the entrance to the T, and then walk past it. There will be benches and trees in the brick sidewalk around you.   Directly ahead on your right is E25, which is attached to MIT Medical. Walk up the stairs and to the door. Notice that there is a label in the glass by the entrance telling you what building it is. There are similar helpful labels on all buildings on campus, or at least all the buildings that I’ve encountered.   You will soon have an ID card that can get you into E25 after hours. For now, if it is after hours you will need to walk around the building (see map below) or wait for someone to open the door for you. If it’s daytime and the door is unlocked, pass through E25 and into the courtyard.   Ahead on the left is the Media Lab. The arch just to the right of the Media Lab was the setting for the upside down lounge hack the CPW when I was a prefrosh. You can also see the Green Building (and its white weather balloon) poking out well behind the Media Lab. Keep walking toward and then under the arch. As you pass the Media Lab on your left, you can look into the first floor to contemplate some art. There is a lot of art at MIT (which you can highlight in the map below and track down in person if you’d like). Go down the stairs and across the street. East Campus is directly on your left. On your right is building 66 (the pointy triangular one in the photo on the right), where you will turn in your 7.01x p-sets and maybe take some biology classes. Main campus is ahead of you (you can just barely see the Great Dome in the photo on the right).   Follow the map below to your living group. You can return to this map whenever you have Internet access at whereis.mit.edu. I’ve marked buildings 66 and E25, which I mentioned above. Welcome home! :)

Women and Their Stereotypical Roles in George Eliot’s Middlemarch - Literature Essay Samples

George Eliot’s novel Middlemarch provides the reader with a valuable insight into the lives of different women in the first half of nineteenth century provincial England. The novel gives its readers a good idea of how people interact with and are formed by society, but it also offers a rather detailed study of some characters’ inherent qualities and their impact on interactions with other people and the formation of the protagonists’ role in life. In the focus of this paper are the four marriageable young women: Dorothea and Celia Brooke, Rosamond Vincy and Mary Garth. Although Dorothea is often in the centre of attention, Eliot provides her readers with enough information on all four women and an assessment of their characters and life styles can be made. Due to differences in character, ambitions, actions and of course different positions in society, the roles of these four women vary considerably. Additionally, in the course of the novel, various predicaments bring out traits of character that do not adhere to the outward picture of these women. I will try to incorporate both the characteristics of the women during more peaceful times as well as their characteristics in times of crises into the study of their character. All four characters seem to have some preconceptions about how they must act and most of their actions arise from these preconceptions. I will argue that all four women behave according to a role stereotype and that they choose to abide by them voluntarily. With the exception of Celia, who has to endure no hardship, all four women are tried considerably by their fates and having a role stereotype seems to give them a protective shell. This paper is concerned with the question of how they keep themselves within their respective stereotype and how all of these stereotypes adhere, if only in some aspect(s) to the ideal of the Angel in the House.In the following analysis, the influence of society on how the four women adhere to their respective role stereotypes is of secondary importance, except for the initial influence of class, which determines their position in society. Of course, the aspects of beauty and the perception of the women as beautiful or plain are strongly intertwined with society; however, it will be treated here only from the point of view of the women. Another important issue is the question of what this fictional reality depicts and how it is depicted (and to what cause). Especially to feminist criticism, which praised Eliot for her criticism of the patriarchal system, Eliot’s depiction of women who are not independent in spirit and actions as she was herself seems puzzling (Langland 184). However, in her book Nobody’s Angels Elizabeth Langland argues that such a depiction is a manifestation of Eliot’s desire to capture an â€Å"essential truth (187).† She does so by â€Å"emphasizing †¦ the invisibility of women in the wider social world of nineteen th-century genteel society †¦ (Newman 96).† Below, I will try to show how the women contribute to this by holding themselves within restricted areas of action. The most immediately apparent and best adhered to female stereotype is the one assumed by Celia Brooke. To her, being a housewife and mother comes naturally and it is her greatest wish. Additionally to having a good starting position of being of good birth, she also cares about her appearance; her dress â€Å"[has] a shade of coquetry in its arrangements (Eliot 5).† The fact that she is spoken of as having more â€Å"common-sense† than her well-read sister also points to her being a perfect specimen of a fine Victorian woman. Although she seems to esteem her sister very much, she is also well aware of the fact that her own sense of what is right for a lady of her social standing is better and more pragmatic, as the jewel scene shows. She is â€Å"hurt† by her sister’s â€Å"assumption o f superiority (Eliot 10)† that she, Celia, would be interested in jewels, while Dorothea’s mind is above such things, but she also watches her sister carefully, because she almost expects â€Å"that her sister [will] sho[w] some weakness (Eliot 11).† Even Celia’s bodily functions seem to adhere to her role, as she has a colour, or rather blushing â€Å"code† that accompanies her verbal reactions. When she wants to tell her sister about being engaged to Sir James, â€Å"[her] colour change[s] again and again (Eliot 229)† and Dorothea concludes that this kind of blushing â€Å"must mean more than Celia’s blushing usually d[oes] (Eliot 229).†Celia has a very good knowledge of what is right for a good woman to do and what isn’t, but the knowledge about proper behaviour is not all. She also seems to fit the stereotype she chose for herself perfectly in her beliefs. Her choice of husband seems to be based on her conviction of t he fact that he is a suitable match rather than on love and her perfect rendition of the stereotype of the good Victorian woman makes her the perfect wife for Chettam. Even when Eliot first writes about Chettam realizing that he might like the younger Miss Brooke too, she subtly indicates Celia’s strong consciousness of proper etiquette, since Eliot writes that â€Å"[a]way from her sister, Celia talked quite easily (18)† to Sir James. That seems to indicate that while Dorothea is around, Celia lets her talk to Sir James, because she knows of his interest in Dorothea. She only begins thinking about him as a good match for herself after Dorothea is married. Other instances that prove how well Celia is integrated into her stereotype are when she expresses her husband’s opinions on something instead of saying â€Å"I think.† For example: â€Å"[h]ow can you marry Ladislaw ? It shocks James so dreadfully (Eliot 674).† The notion that male opinions are worth more and that man are meant to complete great projects and bring upon change in society is also expressed when Celia tells Dorothea jokingly that maybe Arthur, Celia’s son, will go on making great plans such as Dorothea once wanted to devise (Williams Elliott 195). Here Celia does not console her sister by telling her that maybe she herself will someday be able to fulfil her dream, but assumes that a man can do it better. All these instances point to the fact, that Celia is a not only abiding by the Victorian â€Å"rules† for good female behaviour, but that she is highly content to do so and does not even consider the possibility of thinking differently.The most striking of Rosamond’s qualities is her refinement. Her manners and appearance are perfectly graceful and polished. All this makes her the perfect ornamental wife, whom many people regard as a perfect woman. However, all these accomplishments also attest to a high degree of artificiality. The role Rosamond chose is that of a woman who â€Å"even act[s] her own character, and so well, that she d[oes] not know it to be precisely her own (Eliot 97).† The fact that she only assumes this part is precisely the problem. Unlike Celia Brooke, who is warm-hearted and loving on the inside as well as being a faultless lady on the outside, Rosamond is selfish and driven only by her desire to climb up the social ladder and be admired by people for her beauty and affluence. As Elizabeth Langland writes, â€Å"Rosamond †¦ is depicted as armoured in a hard social shell that protects the blind egoism of a vulnerable self (Langland 189).† The use of this protective â€Å"armour† goes as far that Rosamond is completely unable to address her financial problems. Her qualities as a perfect wife are merely superficial, just like her superior musical talent that is not really her, but the â€Å"seized †¦ manner of playing† of her teacher, Rosamond’s qualit ies are only assumed and superficial. Rosamond, however, is fully convinced, that outward â€Å"behaviour constitutes the person (Langland 189)† and that therefore, her refined manners mean that everything she does is right and will ultimately lead to her attaining a high social standing. As Langland points out, â€Å"Rosamond sees society as a medium for her quest (188)† and therefore assumes the manner that will charm society. What Rosamond forgets to consider are the effects of her actions, particularly her tendency to overspend money.Rosamond’s decision to marry Lydgate is again based, as many of her actions, on the stereotype she adheres to. She assesses her situation and knows that she can escape her low social class by using her beauty and refinement to her advantage. When she hears that Lydgate is of considerably high birth, she instantly considers him a good match. Additionally, she believes that he will â€Å"increase the practice (Eliot 291)†, as she tells her father, and be able to use his position for social networking. After her marriage, Rosamond assumes a strongly passive role. Not only does she not pay attention to her husband’s aspirations (â€Å"Do you know, Tertius, I often wish you had not been a medical man. [†¦] And your cousins at Quallingham all think that you have sunk below them in your choice of profession (Eliot 377)†) and problems, Langland also points out her passivity when it comes to her own goal: that of reaching a higher social rank (Langland 192). In order to achieve social advancement, Rosamond should be far more active socially than she is; she should make many social calls and not accept as many social calls from Ladislaw, since that might jeopardize her reputation (Langland 192). An interesting fact about Rosamond, which may explain her passiveness, is that her adaptation to the stereotype she chose goes so far that in moments when she is unprepared for what she encounters, she is completely different. There are two instances where Eliot portrays a different Rosamond. The most memorable one is probably the talk between her and Dorothea in chap. 81. However, there is another moment when emotions let Rosamond forget her acting let her appear natural and vulnerable. She is â€Å"made nervous by her struggle between mortification and the wish not to betray it (Eliot 249),† Lydgate sees â€Å"a certain helpless quivering (249)† in her eyes and â€Å"[t]hat moment of naturalness [is] the crystallising feather-touch [that shakes] flirtation into love (249).† The fact that Rosamond appears vulnerable proofs that she uses her stereotypical â€Å"perfect Victorian lady† behaviour as a protective shield. When Lydgate falls in love with her, she naturally assumes, that he will be the one who will protect her, provide and think for her. Her stereotypical behaviour complies with what was expected of a young lady like Rosamond at that time . Mary is the opposite of the egoist Rosamond (Paris 83). She also stands in stark opposition to every careless, carefree, imprudent or immodest character in the novel. Mary is content with her social class, because she came to accept it. Since early childhood she had been taught that girls like her (â€Å"dreadful plain,† poor, not very high birth) are not to expect much from life. Over the years Mary even seems to have developed a slight bitterness and sarcasm (Paris 84). When Rosamond tries to reassure Mary, who sees herself as looking like â€Å"a brown patch (Eliot 93)† next to Rosamond, by saying that â€Å"[b]eauty is of very little consequence in reality (93),† Mary answers â€Å"sardonically (93)† that Rosamond must be speaking only of Mary’s beauty, since she knows very well how important Rosamond’s beauty is. Mary confines herself to the restrictions of her class and does not wish to be a social climber. Through that complacent ro le â€Å"she is less vulnerable to frustration and less likely to be destructive to others (Paris 83).† Her pragmatic approach to life and its problems, however, seems to be just the key to her happiness. Mary’s chosen stereotype is also that of a young woman who has stern standards and principles. These principles help her taking a rather active part in Fred’s life. When she tells him that she could never marry a man who is as careless and indifferent as he is, she indirectly contributes to Fred’s improvement of character. Although here must be emphasized one more time that Mary, as all Middlemarch women, abides by the rules dictated by the stereotype she chooses for herself. She participates in Fred’s path of recovery from careless youth to responsible young man, but she does not take part actively (Langland 203). Instead she waits for fate to take its turn, knowing that in the long run, she may be harmed by it. However, this behaviour also reinf orces the impression that Mary does not want to use Fred’s love for her to gain a higher social status. She proves that on several occasions. For example she tells Mr Farebrother that she believes that â€Å"Fred has sense and knowledge enough to make him respectable, if he likes †¦ [but h]is being a clergyman would only be for gentility’s sake, and I think there is nothing more contemptible than such imbecile gentility (Eliot 426).† Mary shows concern not for herself and her possibilities of respectfulness and a higher status, but for Fred’s life and his happiness, which, as she thinks and he proved by dropping out of College, he could never find by being a clergyman.Mary’s stereotype acts protectively in a sense that it helps her to achieve happiness and contentment as well as escape having to work as a governess to earn a living. We can see that Mary actively chooses this stereotype by the fact that she would rather stay with the irritable and ungrateful old Mr Featherstone, who treats her just like he would treat any maid. Her other option would be to go away and work as a governess, which she detests and for which she feels absolutely unfit. Paris claims that this is partially due to the fact that being a governess would be a step down from her current position (88 f.), which does not correspond to the fact that she resists the possibility of social advancement in any other way (by marrying Farebrother or pushing Fred to become a clergyman, which would elevate her own status if she would marry him). Further, Paris proposes that Mary’s resistance to working as a governess may be explained by her desire to stay at home rather than leave and have to live on her own (Paris 88 f.). Paris attributes this to Mary’s craving for stability in life, which he sees rooted in the fact that, growing up, she had to endure the trauma of being inferior to her peers in ways of looks, status and wealth (Paris 87).It is in teresting to compare Mary and Rosamond, since they make a series of decisions and take several actions that are complete opposites. Since Mary grew up in a family who was never wealthy, she is accustomed to thinking about financial problems and possible solutions. Rosamond, on the other hand, â€Å"had not yet had any anxiety about ways and means, although her domestic life had been expensive as well as eventful (Eliot 477).† While Mary’s first reaction to her father telling her that he needs some money to pay up for Fred’s debt is to give him her own savings, Rosamond asks Lydgate â€Å"What can I do [†¦]? (Eliot 489),† instead of asking â€Å"what can I do?† Rosamond’s instant idea is to ask her father or any other relative for money, whereas Mary’s pride (and that of her family) would not allow anything like that. Mary’s strict principles, her pride and common-sense forbid her to answer Fred’s feelings when he is indebted and thereby maybe help to steer him onto the right path, which ultimately leads to a pleasant life together. Rosamond’s pride, however, is based merely on outward appearance and manners and does not forbid her to ask a relative of Lydgate’s for money, which shames Lydgate. Rosamond’s careless conduct, spending habits and disregard of her husband’s wishes and feelings lead to an unhappy marriage and contribute to Lydgate’s ruin. Hence, in the end it is the plain, poor Mary, who had impossibly worse starting conditions, who achieves happiness, while Rosamond, on whom nature and her comparatively wealthy family bestowed every possible advantage, lives in an unhappy marriage and never reaches her primary goal of being a woman whom others regard an important member of society.Dorothea seems to be the most free-spirited of the women, yet also strongly constructs her personality. In the beginning she is a young woman who wishes to elevate hersel f above others by being more intelligent and less concerned with everyday things (â€Å"to her the destinies of mankind, seen by the light of Christianity, made the solicitudes of feminine fashion appear an occupation for Bedlam (Eliot 6)†). This quote, as well as others, show Dorothea’s ideal to be directed against the general opinion of what is feminine and of how proper ladies should behave. However, she chooses a feminine stereotype for herself by marrying Casaubon. Before she marries him, she devises great plans of how she may alleviate the burdens of the poor and she seems to really believe in her cause. Everyday, pragmatic things seem to not be enough for her, since she strives to raise above others through matters of â€Å"higher† value. In marrying Casaubon she seeks to assist a man she believes to be great in completing his great work. However, as ironic as it is, Dorothea ends up being confined within the prison of typical womanhood of the time. She i s denied to participate in the completion of Casaubon’s work and becomes more and more unhappy and bored. Interestingly enough, the situation of her married life echoes a situation where Sir James Chettam offers her a Maltese lapdog, a breed very fashionable among ladies of higher social ranks (Eliot 24). Dorothea refuses the gift, saying:â€Å"It is painful to me to see these creatures that are bred merely as pets. [†¦] I believe all the petting that is given them does not make them happy. They are too helpless: their lives too frail. A weasel or a mouse that gets its own living is more interesting.† (Eliot 24)Dorothea’s comment about the dog seems to apply to her life with Casaubon. Just like the lapdog, she is not content with the fact that he thinks she is a nice young lady and just like the lapdog’s existence, hers is filled with passivity and dullness. This passivity, as Langland points out, does not pass after Casaubon dies. According to Langland, Dorothea seems to be sitting around in Lowick most of the time (Langland 192 f.). Additionally, Eliot seems to belittle Dorothea’s existence by describing the errands she makes in town as â€Å"little† (â€Å"little† is joined by other adjectives that belittle Dorothea’s and the other women’s lives), which seems to indicate that Dorothea’s significance is marginal (Langland 193). The fact that Dorothea is affluent, influential and intelligent enough to be able to act differently, indicates that it again must be her who confines her to the stereotypical female passivity. Williams Elliott claims that the â€Å"philanthropic heroine was meant to fail (Williams Elliott 190),† since George Eliot wanted to show as real a picture as possible of nineteenth-century provincial England and having great reforming plans was regarded unfeminine (Williams Elliott 196). Also, she points out, Dorothea is talked out of real izing her project of building a village with a school for industry by men, namely Mr Brooke and Sir James (Williams Elliott 196). Since Dorothea does not act against that she chooses to not â€Å"ste[p] out of her place as a woman (Williams Elliott 196)†. Not only does Dorothea not object to being patronized by her uncle and brother in law, she betrays her initial ideals completely by slowly turning into a stereotypical romantic heroine whose wish to follow her heart’s desire is stronger than reason. By marrying Ladislaw she chooses to give up her fortune, which already puts her in a position where she can help less (and therefore fulfill her initial ambitions less). Additionally, she voluntarily, out of love and desire for Ladislaw, confines herself to a life in which she is the weaker part. She does, as described in the Finale, help Ladislaw with his career in politics, but this is not a great contribution and it reduces Dorothea to a merely supporting role, whereas she could have been in a leading position supervising the work on her housing projects.An important issue is Dorothea’s wish to do good no matter what. In a conversation with Will, Dorothea talks passionately about her wish to contribute to a higher good and â€Å"power against evil.† She says that she is aware of her insignificance, but she feels that â€Å"†¦ by desiring what is perfectly good, even when we don’t quite know what it is and cannot do what we would, we are part of the divine power against evil †¦ (Eliot 323).† This, she claims,â€Å"is [her] life,† which she â€Å"cannot part with (Eliot 323).† Williams Elliott observes that, in the end, Dorothea is still a person who is passionate about creating an improved living condition. However, she adds, she confines herself to a lesser part, she gives up her greater ideas and becomes the â€Å"woman behind a man† who helps Ladislaw contributing to the higher good (Wi lliams Elliott 199). This position is not an active one, but I would still argue that it is better than Dorothea’s initial position, in which she seemed to be deluded of what this â€Å"higher cause† is. The fact that she becomes a more stereotypical good Victorian woman, helps Dorothea recognize that she can contribute to a higher good by doing rather trivial things.The four women all need their respective shells of stereotypes to provide a protective layer over their lives and actions. Celia is sure that adhering to the stereotype of the good housewife and mother who leaves the thinking to men guarantees her a highly respectable social position, a happy, wealthy existence with a good husband and happy children. Rosamond is fully convinced that her composed behaviour and pleasant appearance are all she needs to be content in life, since these qualities of hers bear the promise of a marriage that will elevate her in society. When she betrays her husband by going behind his back, she never realizes that she is doing something wrong. Mary’s protective shell lies in the fact that she tells herself, that she cannot expect much of her life, because she is not wealthy, beautiful or of good birth. Her approach of expecting the worse (as for example her position as a teacher, a prospect she does not like) appears like a protection again disappointment. In this way, her prospects in life can only improve. Dorothea first tries to live up to a stereotype that she deems more worthy than the others and that, as she assumes, will elevate her intellectually above others. Instead of following her wish of being active herself to help the less fortunate than herself with her plans for improved living, she chooses to help Casaubon and degrades herself to a completely passive woman. By marrying Will and giving up the fortune that would have permitted her to complete some plans, she again chooses an existence that is more passive and where she can only support her husband, instead of being active herself. Dorothea now adopts a new stereotype – that of the perfect wife and mother. Her reasoning that she is still doing something good, if only on a smaller scale is again only part of that new role, since all she does is part of what her husband does and therefore cannot be regarded as independent action.All four women assume a passive part to a certain degree, relying on men to help them achieve their ultimate goal. Even Dorothea, who at first appears to be more independent in her thoughts and less prone to confine herself to a stereotypical female role than the other women, voluntarily succumbs to male support in both marriages. The same stands for Mary, who, by telling him that she cannot marry someone as irresponsible as he, takes a part in correcting Fred’s flaws, but never really acts, waiting for fate to take its course and the men in her life to achieve the kind of order in which Fred would seem a fit match for her. In depicting the struggles for happiness of the four young women, George Eliot stresses ever and anon that in 1830s reality, women would not take risks and try to escape their stereotypes. Instead, they saw these stereotypes as supporting the correct order of society and facilitating their own lives. The women at that time would rather take on a life of â€Å"feminine selflessness (Marks 30)† than try and change the order of the world in which they live. Bibliography Primary Source:Eliot, George. Middlemarch. 1871-72. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics, 2000.Secondary Sources:Langland, Elizabeth. Nobody’s Angels. Middle-Class Women and Domestic Ideology in Victorian Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1995.Marks, Clifford J. â€Å"Middlemarch, Obligation, and Dorothea’s Duplicity.† Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 54.2 (2000): 25-41.Newman, Beth. Subjects on Display. Psychoanalysis, Social Expectation, and Victorian Feminin ity. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2004.Paris, Bernard J. Rereading George Eliot. Changing Responses to Her Experiments in Life. New York: State University of New York Press, 2003.Williams Elliott, Dorice. The Angel Out of the House. Philanthropy and Gender in Nineteenth-Century England. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 2002.